What are substitute products?
Substitute products outside of your industry that meet the same or a similar function as your offerings. Despite using different inputs as your firm (such as different materials, manufacturing processes, types of employees), substitute products may offer a similar benefit to customers. Indeed from a customer’s perspective, the goods may be almost indistinguishable.
Example of substitute products: Glasses vs contact lenses
One classic example of a substitute product is glasses and contact lenses. From a customer’s perspective, both options meet a similar need of correcting vision. People may have preferences for one vs. the other, but ultimately, they both meet a similar need.
From the ‘input’ side, however, glasses and contact lenses are both remarkably different – they use different technologies and manufacturing processes. The companies involved in both areas are different. They also have a slightly different revenue stream – a constant revenue stream in the case of contact lenses vs. one-off purchases for glasses.
Example of substitute products: Ride-sharing vs. taxis
Another example of a substitute product is the difference between ride-sharing (such as Lyft and UberX), and the taxi industry. From the customer’s perspective, these may be very similar offerings – they are both ways of getting a ride from one location to another. The ‘inputs’ involved in both offerings are however very different – while taxi firms have the fleet of vehicles, Uber and Lyft are essentially software companies, focused on the app development and building a network of drivers and users (without actually owning the taxis themselves).
A similar distinction can also be made between hotels and AirB&B – while hotels directly manage the property, employing cleanser and receptionists, AirB&B relies on a network of homeowners who list their homes on the platform – a very different sort of company from traditional hotels, even though from the customer perspective, these are similar offerings.
The impact of substitute products
Substitute products compete with your offerings in a similar way to products within your industry. While customers may have preferences for a particular offering (e.g., glasses vs. contact lenses), should the prices of one increase, customers are likely to switch to the other.
Why substitute products are not always fully considered
One of the real dangers of substitute products is that they are not always fully considered by managers in the main industry. Managers often mainly focus their attention on considering firms that look similar to them – similar inputs and manufacturing processes. This leaves the danger that substitute products can grow potentially without the awareness of managers focused solely on their own industry.
If we take taxis as an example – the rise of Lyft and Uber – which operated with a different model – caught traditional taxi firms by surprise. Yet, these tech firms, which had a very different setup to traditional companies, very quickly became a substantial threat to traditional taxi companies, that had a difficult time adapting to this new rise of competition.
The danger of substitute products: Gradually improving in performance over time
Part of the danger of substitute products is that they can gradually improve over time – potentially without the awareness of managers focused on their own industry.
Responding to substitute products may also be further complicated if they have developed capabilities that your firm does not have. Their different resource base may be challenging to develop making it difficult to know how to respond.
This article explores the fundamental difference between an industry and a substitute industry – how the inputs to the industries differ, thus resulting in different means of production.
Listening to different groups of customers: Existing customers, the customers of your competitors, and non-customers
There are many different types of customer feedback – each with different sources of insight. This article explores reasons for seeking a diverse range of customer opinions.
This article explores the key differences between the PESTEL and Porter’s Five Forces frameworks.
While there are many advantages to getting customer feedback, there are also potential dangers of listening only to your existing customers.
This article explores approaches for new firms to overcome entry barriers – to work around difficulties that traditionally make it hard for new firms to successfully enter an industry with high barriers to entry.
This article explores the importance of Porter’s Five Forces for startups, and how startups can use it to more successfully enter markets.
This article explores the importance of strategic frameworks for investors – how they can improve investment choices.
This article unpacks the Resource Based View of the firm – explaining its difference from other strategic perspectives and its importance to management.
This article explores how access to distribution channels can act as a barrier to entry and ways over overcoming it.